Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39330585›Full record

ReviewToxics2024

A Comprehensive Review of Lab-Scale Studies on Removing Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solutions by Using Unmodified and Modified Waste Biomass as Adsorbents.

Manikant Tripathi, Sukriti Pathak, Ranjan Singh, Pankaj Singh, Pradeep Kumar Singh, Awadhesh Kumar Shukla, Sadanand Maurya, Sukhminderjit Kaur, Babita Thakur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manikant TripathiBiotechnology Program, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya 224001, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2020-8709
Sukriti PathakBiotechnology Program, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya 224001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ranjan SinghDepartment of Microbiology, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya 224001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Pankaj SinghBiotechnology Program, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya 224001, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2290-0563
Pradeep Kumar SinghDepartment of Biochemistry, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya 224001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Awadhesh Kumar ShuklaDepartment of Botany, K.S. Saket P.G. College, Ayodhya 224001, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5974-1300
Sadanand MauryaDepartment of Botany, K.S. Saket P.G. College, Ayodhya 224001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sukhminderjit KaurDepartment of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India.
Babita ThakurDepartment of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India.ORCID 0009-0000-7964-640X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities and increasing human population has led to one of the major global problems of heavy metal contamination in ecosystems and to the generation of a huge amount of waste material biomass. Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is the major contaminant introduced by various industrial effluents and activities into the ecosystem. Cr(VI) is a known mutagen and carcinogen with numerous detrimental effects on the health of humans, plants, and animals, jeopardizing the balance of ecosystems. Therefore, the remediation of such a hazardous toxic metal pollutant from the environment is necessary. Various physical and chemical methods are available for the sequestration of toxic metals. However, adsorption is recognized as a more efficient technology for Cr(VI) remediation. Adsorption by utilizing waste material biomass as adsorbents is a sustainable approach in remediating hazardous pollutants, thus serving the dual purpose of remediating Cr(VI) and exploiting waste material biomass in an eco- friendly manner. Agricultural biomass, industrial residues, forest residues, and food waste are the primary waste material biomass that could be employed, with different strategies, for the efficient sequestration of toxic Cr(VI). This review focuses on the use of diverse waste biomass, such as industrial and agricultural by-products, for the effective remediation of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. The review also focuses on the operational conditions that improve Cr(VI) remediation, describes the efficacy of various biomass materials and modifications, and assesses the general sustainability of these approaches to reducing Cr(VI) pollution.

Indexed as

adsorptionenvironmental pollutionsustainabilitytoxic chromiumwaste biomass

Identifiers

PMID39330585
PMCPMC11435892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.