ReviewMembranes2024
How Is Bone Regeneration Influenced by Polymer Membranes? Insight into the Histological and Radiological Point of View in the Literature.
Review in Membranes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biofunctional Testing of a Degradable Implant Made by Mg-Nd and Mg-Zn Alloys Used for Bone Defects.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrated Analysis of an Innovative Composite Polycaprolactone Membrane and a Jason Membrane in Guided Bone Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze published works that investigate the in vivo bone regeneration capacity of polymeric membranes loaded with active substances and growth factors. This scoping review's purpose was to highlight the histological and radiological interpretation of the locally produced effects of the polymer membranes studied so far. For the selection of the articles, a search was made in the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases, according to the PRISMA algorithm, for research/clinical trial type studies. The search strategy was represented by the formula "((biodegradable scaffolds AND critical bone defect) OR (polymers AND mechanical properties) OR (3Dmaterials AND cytotoxicity) AND bone tissue regeneration)" for the PubMed database and "((biodegradable scaffolds AND polymers) OR (polymers AND critical bone defects) OR (biodegradable scaffolds AND mechanical properties) AND bone tissue regeneration)" for the ScienceDirect database. Ethical approval was not required. Eligibility criteria included eight clinical studies published between 2018 and 2023. Our analysis showed that polymer membranes that met most histopathological criteria also produced the most remarkable results observed radiologically. The top effective scaffolds were those containing active macromolecules released conditionally and staged. The PLGA and polycaprolactone scaffolds were found in this category; they granted a marked increase in bone density and improvement of osteoinduction. But, regardless of the membrane composition, all membranes implanted in created bone defects induced an inflammatory response in the first phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.