Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39330467›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2024

Evidence for the Beneficial Effect of Reward on Working Memory: A Meta-Analytic Study.

Weiyu Wang, Xin Yan, Xinyu He, Jiehui Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Weiyu WangDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, #132 Waihuan Dong Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Xin YanDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, #132 Waihuan Dong Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Xinyu HeDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, #132 Waihuan Dong Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Jiehui QianDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, #132 Waihuan Dong Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5534-5714

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2021A1515010840National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rewards act as external motivators and can improve performance in various cognitive tasks. However, previous research demonstrated mixed findings regarding the effect of reward on working memory (WM) performance, and the question of whether reward enhances WM performance is arguable. It remains unclear how the effect of reward on WM can be influenced by various factors, such as types of reward and experimental paradigms. In this meta-analytic study, we systematically investigated the effect of reward on WM by analyzing data from 51 eligible studies involving a total of 1767 participants. Our results showed that reward robustly enhanced WM performance, with non-monetary rewards inducing more benefits than monetary rewards. This may be because, while both types of reward could induce extrinsic motivation, non-monetary rewards enhanced intrinsic motivation while monetary rewards reduced it. Notably, all three reward methods-reward binding, reward expectation, and subliminal reward-effectively improved WM performance, with the reward binding paradigm exhibiting the greatest effects. This finding suggests that the reward effect can be attributed to both increasing the total amount of WM resources and improving the flexibility of resource reallocation. Moreover, the type of WM, the experimental paradigms, and the outcome measures are three moderators that should be jointly considered when assessing the reward effects on WM. Overall, this meta-analytic study provides solid evidence that reward improves WM performance and reveals possible mechanisms underlying these improvements.

Indexed as

meta-analysismotivationrewardworking memory

Identifiers

PMID39330467
PMCPMC11433210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.