ArticleJournal of imaging2024
Convolutional Neural Network-Machine Learning Model: Hybrid Model for Meningioma Tumour and Healthy Brain Classification.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid Decision-Level Fusion of CNN-Based Deep and Handcrafted Features for Colon Cancer Classification.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Advanced Deep Learning Architectures in MRI-Based Brain Tumor Classification: A Systematic Review Focused on Meningiomas.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- From Detection to Diagnosis: An Advanced Transfer Learning Pipeline Using YOLO11 with Morphological Post-Processing for Brain Tumor Analysis for MRI Images.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- StrokeNeXt: an automated stroke classification model using computed tomography and magnetic resonance images.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- A hybrid learning network with progressive resizing and PCA for diagnosis of cervical cancer on WSI slides.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning fusion for glioma tumor detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Efficient and Accurate Brain Tumor Classification Using Hybrid MobileNetV2-Support Vector Machine for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostics in Neoplasms.Brain sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a hybrid study of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), machine learning (ML), and transfer learning (TL) in the context of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The anatomy of the brain is very complex; inside the skull, a brain tumour can form in any part. With MRI technology, cross-sectional images are generated, and radiologists can detect the abnormalities. When the size of the tumour is very small, it is undetectable to the human visual system, necessitating alternative analysis using AI tools. As is widely known, CNNs explore the structure of an image and provide features on the SoftMax fully connected (SFC) layer, and the classification of the items that belong to the input classes is established. Two comparison studies for the classification of meningioma tumours and healthy brains are presented in this paper: (i) classifying MRI images using an original CNN and two pre-trained CNNs, DenseNet169 and EfficientNetV2B0; (ii) determining which CNN and ML combination yields the most accurate classification when SoftMax is replaced with three ML models; in this context, Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were proposed. In a binary classification of tumours and healthy brains, the EfficientNetB0-SVM combination shows an accuracy of 99.5% on the test dataset. A generalisation of the results was performed, and overfitting was prevented by using the bagging ensemble method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.