Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39330427›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

Beyond Nyquist: A Comparative Analysis of 3D Deep Learning Models Enhancing MRI Resolution.

Soumick Chatterjee, Alessandro Sciarra, Max Dünnwald, Anitha Bhat Talagini Ashoka, Mayura Gurjar Cheepinahalli Vasudeva, Shudarsan Saravanan, Venkatesh Thirugnana Sambandham, Pavan Tummala, Steffen Oeltze-Jafra, Oliver Speck and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Soumick ChatterjeeData and Knowledge Engineering Group, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7594-1188
Alessandro SciarraDepartment of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Max DünnwaldFaculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Anitha Bhat Talagini AshokaFaculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-7717-6943
Mayura Gurjar Cheepinahalli VasudevaFaculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Shudarsan SaravananFaculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Venkatesh Thirugnana SambandhamFaculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6974-7669
Pavan TummalaFaculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Steffen Oeltze-JafraMedDigit, Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Oliver SpeckDepartment of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6019-5597
Andreas NürnbergerData and Knowledge Engineering Group, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4311-0624

Funding

RGR-based motion tracking for real-time adaptive MR imaging and spectroscopyR01DA021146 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ERNST, THOMAS M · 2007 to 2018
$8.6M
Federal State of Saxony-Anhlat (Germany) I88NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-spatial resolution MRI produces abundant structural information, enabling highly accurate clinical diagnosis and image-guided therapeutics. However, the acquisition of high-spatial resolution MRI data typically can come at the expense of less spatial coverage, lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and longer scan time due to physical, physiological and hardware limitations. In order to overcome these limitations, super-resolution MRI deep-learning-based techniques can be utilised. In this work, different state-of-the-art 3D convolution neural network models for super resolution (RRDB, SPSR, UNet, UNet-MSS and ShuffleUNet) were compared for the super-resolution task with the goal of finding the best model in terms of performance and robustness. The public IXI dataset (only structural images) was used. Data were artificially downsampled to obtain lower-resolution spatial MRIs (downsampling factor varying from 8 to 64). When assessing performance using the SSIM metric in the test set, all models performed well. In particular, regardless of the downsampling factor, the UNet consistently obtained the top results. On the other hand, the SPSR model consistently performed worse. In conclusion, UNet and UNet-MSS achieved overall top performances while RRDB performed relatively poorly compared to the other models.

Indexed as

deep learningMRIsuper-resolutionundersampling

Identifiers

PMID39330427
PMCPMC11433164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.