ArticleJournal of imaging2024
Beyond Nyquist: A Comparative Analysis of 3D Deep Learning Models Enhancing MRI Resolution.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning approach to super-resolution correction of brain MRI motion artifacts for accurate hippocampal volumetry.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CHARMS: A CNN-Transformer Hybrid with Attention Regularization for MRI Super-Resolution.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-spatial resolution MRI produces abundant structural information, enabling highly accurate clinical diagnosis and image-guided therapeutics. However, the acquisition of high-spatial resolution MRI data typically can come at the expense of less spatial coverage, lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and longer scan time due to physical, physiological and hardware limitations. In order to overcome these limitations, super-resolution MRI deep-learning-based techniques can be utilised. In this work, different state-of-the-art 3D convolution neural network models for super resolution (RRDB, SPSR, UNet, UNet-MSS and ShuffleUNet) were compared for the super-resolution task with the goal of finding the best model in terms of performance and robustness. The public IXI dataset (only structural images) was used. Data were artificially downsampled to obtain lower-resolution spatial MRIs (downsampling factor varying from 8 to 64). When assessing performance using the SSIM metric in the test set, all models performed well. In particular, regardless of the downsampling factor, the UNet consistently obtained the top results. On the other hand, the SPSR model consistently performed worse. In conclusion, UNet and UNet-MSS achieved overall top performances while RRDB performed relatively poorly compared to the other models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.