ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2024
Beyond Clinical Factors: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence and Multimodal Cardiac Imaging to Predict Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Post-Catheter Ablation.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and external validation of a nomogram to predict the need for electrical cardioversion during radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Integration of EHR and ECG Data for Predicting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Stroke Patients.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical, Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia, with catheter ablation being a key alternative to medical treatment for restoring normal sinus rhythm. Despite advances in understanding AF pathogenesis, approximately 35% of patients experience AF recurrence at 12 months after catheter ablation. Therefore, accurate prediction of AF recurrence occurring after catheter ablation is important for patient selection and management. Conventional methods for predicting post-catheter ablation AF recurrence, which involve the use of univariate predictors and scoring systems, have played a supportive role in clinical decision-making. In an ever-changing landscape where technology is becoming ubiquitous within medicine, cardiac imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) could prove pivotal in enhancing AF recurrence predictions by providing data with independent predictive power and identifying key relationships in the data. This review comprehensively explores the existing methods for predicting the recurrence of AF following catheter ablation from different perspectives, including conventional predictors and scoring systems, cardiac imaging-based methods, and AI-based methods developed using a combination of demographic and imaging variables. By summarising state-of-the-art technologies, this review serves as a roadmap for developing future prediction models with enhanced accuracy, generalisability, and explainability, potentially contributing to improved care for patients with AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.