ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2024
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Chronic Limb Ischemia: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Treatment Success Following Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion: A Multivariable Prediction Model with Clinical Nomogram.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Psychological determinants and predictors of outcomes in spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review.Pain reports · 2026Review
- Spinal Cord Stimulation for Non-Reconstructable Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Real-World, Multidisciplinary, Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in managing refractory upper-extremity pain.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: Advances, Outcomes, and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Prophylactic Fibrin Glue Application for Immediate Management of Dural Puncture during Spinal Cord Stimulation Lead Placement: a Simple and Effective Technique.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Review
- Editorial: Diagnosis and treatment for arteriosclerosis and thrombosis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most severe form of peripheral arterial disease, significantly impacting quality of life, morbidity and mortality. Common complications include severe limb pain, walking difficulties, ulcerations and limb amputations. For cases of CLI where surgical or endovascular reconstruction is not possible or fails, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may be a treatment option. Currently, SCS is primarily prescribed as a symptomatic treatment for painful symptoms. It is used to treat intractable pain arising from various disorders, such as neuropathic pain secondary to persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) and painful diabetic neuropathy. Data regarding the effect of SCS in treating CLI are varied, with the mechanism of action of vasodilatation in the peripheral microcirculatory system not yet fully understood. This review focuses on the surgical technique, new modalities of SCS, the mechanisms of action of SCS in vascular diseases and the parameters for selecting CLI patients, along with the clinical outcomes and complications. SCS is a safe and effective surgical option in selected patients with CLI, where surgical or endovascular revascularization is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.