ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Federated Adversarial Fault Diagnosis Method Driven by Fault Information Discrepancy.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) facilitates the collaborative optimization of fault diagnosis models across multiple clients. However, the performance of the global model in the federated center is contingent upon the effectiveness of the local models. Low-quality local models participating in the federation can result in negative transfer within the FL framework. Traditional regularization-based FL methods can partially mitigate the performance disparity between local models. Nevertheless, they do not adequately address the inconsistency in model optimization directions caused by variations in fault information distribution under different working conditions, thereby diminishing the applicability of the global model. This paper proposes a federated adversarial fault diagnosis method driven by fault information discrepancy (FedAdv_ID) to address the challenge of constructing an optimal global model under multiple working conditions. A consistency evaluation metric is introduced to quantify the discrepancy between local and global average fault information, guiding the federated adversarial training mechanism between clients and the federated center to minimize feature discrepancy across clients. In addition, an optimal aggregation strategy is developed based on the information discrepancies among different clients, which adaptively learns the aggregation weights and model parameters needed to reduce global feature discrepancy, ultimately yielding an optimal global model. Experiments conducted on benchmark and real-world motor-bearing datasets demonstrate that FedAdv_ID achieves a fault diagnosis accuracy of 93.09% under various motor operating conditions, outperforming model regularization-based FL methods by 17.89%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.