Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39330053›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Federated Adversarial Fault Diagnosis Method Driven by Fault Information Discrepancy.

Jiechen Sun, Funa Zhou, Jie Chen, Chaoge Wang, Xiong Hu, Tianzhen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiechen SunSchool of Logistic Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Funa ZhouSchool of Logistic Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Jie ChenSchool of Logistic Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Chaoge WangSchool of Logistic Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Xiong HuSchool of Logistic Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Tianzhen WangSchool of Logistic Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7525-8466

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62073213National Natural Science Foundation Youth Science Foundation Project 52205111Shanghai Maritime University Graduate Student Training Program for Top Innovative Talents 2022YBR019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) facilitates the collaborative optimization of fault diagnosis models across multiple clients. However, the performance of the global model in the federated center is contingent upon the effectiveness of the local models. Low-quality local models participating in the federation can result in negative transfer within the FL framework. Traditional regularization-based FL methods can partially mitigate the performance disparity between local models. Nevertheless, they do not adequately address the inconsistency in model optimization directions caused by variations in fault information distribution under different working conditions, thereby diminishing the applicability of the global model. This paper proposes a federated adversarial fault diagnosis method driven by fault information discrepancy (FedAdv_ID) to address the challenge of constructing an optimal global model under multiple working conditions. A consistency evaluation metric is introduced to quantify the discrepancy between local and global average fault information, guiding the federated adversarial training mechanism between clients and the federated center to minimize feature discrepancy across clients. In addition, an optimal aggregation strategy is developed based on the information discrepancies among different clients, which adaptively learns the aggregation weights and model parameters needed to reduce global feature discrepancy, ultimately yielding an optimal global model. Experiments conducted on benchmark and real-world motor-bearing datasets demonstrate that FedAdv_ID achieves a fault diagnosis accuracy of 93.09% under various motor operating conditions, outperforming model regularization-based FL methods by 17.89%.

Indexed as

fault diagnosisfederated adversarialfederated learninginformation discrepancy

Identifiers

PMID39330053
PMCPMC11431357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.