Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39330048›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Sequencing, and Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Avelumab First-Line Maintenance in the United States.

Helen H Moon, Mairead Kearney, Seyed Hamidreza Mahmoudpour, Chiemeka Ike, Valerie Morris, Andrew Rava, Sonia Kim, Haiyan Sun, Marley Boyd, Gabriel Gomez Rey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Helen H MoonKaiser Permanente Southern California, Riverside, CA 92505, USA.
Mairead KearneyMerck Healthcare KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
Seyed Hamidreza MahmoudpourMerck Healthcare KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
Chiemeka IkeEMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA 02370, USA.
Valerie MorrisEMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA 02370, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0355-7379
Andrew RavaGenesis Research Group, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-4451
Sonia KimGenesis Research Group, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
Haiyan SunGenesis Research Group, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
Marley BoydGenesis Research Group, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
Gabriel Gomez ReyGenesis Research Group, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.

Funding

Merck n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), first-line (1L) treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by avelumab 1L maintenance (1LM) is a recommended therapy per treatment guidelines in patients without disease progression. However, contemporary real-world (rw) data among patients receiving this treatment are necessary to understand clinical outcomes and optimal treatment sequencing. This retrospective cohort study analyzed rw treatment patterns and clinical outcomes, including overall survival (rwOS) and progression-free survival (rwPFS), in patients with la/mUC receiving avelumab 1LM. From the Flatiron Health database, 214 patients who received avelumab 1LM following 1L PBC were included. From the start of avelumab 1LM, median rwOS was 23.8 months (95% CI: 18.2-not estimable [NE]) and median rwPFS was 5.1 months (95% CI: 4.1-7.0). A total of 96 patients received second-line (2L) therapy, with 53 receiving enfortumab vedotin (EV). From the start of 2L EV, median rwOS was 11.2 months (95% CI: 6.8-NE) and median rwPFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.9-8.8). Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in this study align with guidelines and outcomes observed in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 and EV-301 clinical trials and other rw studies, supporting the use of 1L PBC followed by avelumab 1LM and 2L EV for eligible patients.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, Immunologicalavelumabavelumabclinical outcomescommunity oncologyenfortumab vedotinplatinum-based chemotherapyreal worldsurvivaltreatment sequencingurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39330048
PMCPMC11431044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.