Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39330038›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Hinotori Surgical Robot System Platform: Report of the First Series of Experiences.

Yuta Yamada, Shigenori Kakutani, Yoichi Fujii, Naoki Kimura, Yuji Hakozaki, Jun Kamei, Satoru Taguchi, Aya Niimi, Daisuke Yamada, Haruki Kume

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuta YamadaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Shigenori KakutaniDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Yoichi FujiiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Naoki KimuraDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Yuji HakozakiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Jun KameiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Satoru TaguchiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Aya NiimiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Daisuke YamadaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Haruki KumeDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to describe the first series of six patients undergoing Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (rs-RARP) using the hinotori surgical robot system (hinotori SRS) and to compare the treatment outcomes with those achieved with the da Vinci surgical platform.

methodsThis study included 20 cases involving the rs-RARP procedure (hinotori: N = 6; da Vinci: N = 14) that were performed between May 2021 and April 2024 in a single institution.

resultsNo significant differences were observed between the hinotori and da Vinci groups regarding the preoperative findings. In the hinotori group, there were four cases of pT2 that showed negative surgical margins in all the cases. However, positive surgical margins were observed in two of the cases with pT3. The surgical outcomes were also similar between the two groups except for console time, which tended to be shorter in the da Vinci group (

conclusionThis is the first study to report cases of rs-RARP performed on a hinotori SRS. It seems that the hinotori SRS shows similar treatment outcomes compared with the cases treated via the da Vinci platform.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomehinotoriradical prostatectomyRetzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomyrs-RARP

Identifiers

PMID39330038
PMCPMC11431424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.