Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39330030›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024

Evaluating the Effects of Prostate Radiotherapy Intensified with Pelvic Nodal Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Myelosuppression: Single-Institution Experience.

Yousef Katib, Steven Tisseverasinghe, Ian J Gerard, Benjamin Royal-Preyra, Ahmad Chaddad, Tania Sasson, Boris Bahoric, Federico Roncarolo, Tamim Niazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yousef KatibCollege of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7894-2490
Steven TisseverasingheDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3A 3J1, Canada.
Ian J GerardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3A 3J1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4569-6075
Benjamin Royal-PreyraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3A 3J1, Canada.
Ahmad ChaddadSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3402-9576
Tania SassonFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.
Boris BahoricDepartment of Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Federico RoncaroloSchool of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3N 1X9, Canada.
Tamim NiaziDepartment of Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) management commonly involves the utilization of prostate radiotherapy (PRT), pelvic nodal radiotherapy (PNRT), and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, the potential association of these treatment modalities with bone marrow (BM) suppression remains inadequately reported in the existing literature. This study is designed to comprehensively evaluate the risk of myelosuppression associated with PRT, shedding light on an aspect that has been underrepresented in prior research. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 600 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with prostate radiotherapy (PRT) at a single oncology center between 2007 and 2017. Patients were categorized into four cohorts: PRT alone (n = 149), PRT + ADT, (n = 91), PRT + PNRT (n = 39), and PRT + PNRT + ADT (n = 321). To assess the risk of myelosuppression, we scrutinized specific blood parameters, such as hemoglobin (HGB), white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophils (NEUT), lymphocytes (LYM), and platelets (PLT) at baseline, mid-treatment (mRT), immediately post-RT (pRT), 1 month post-RT (1M-pRT), and 1 year post-RT (1Y-pRT). The inter-cohort statistical significance was evaluated with further stratification based on the utilized RT technique {3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)}.

resultsSignificant statistical differences at baseline were observed in HGB and LYM values among all cohorts (

conclusionsTreatment with PRT, ADT, PNRT, and 3D-CRT is associated with BMS. Despite this statistically significant risk, no patient required additional interventions to manage the outcome. While its clinical impact appears limited, its importance cannot be underestimated in the context of increased integration of novel systemic agents with myelosuppressive properties. Longer follow-up should be considered in future studies.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBone MarrowHumansMaleMiddle AgedPelvisRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective StudiesAndrogen Antagonistsandrogen deprivation therapymyelosuppressionprostate cancerradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID39330030
PMCPMC11431330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.