Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39330011›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024

Role of Systematic Biopsy in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Review.

Wojciech Malewski, Tomasz Milecki, Omar Tayara, Sławomir Poletajew, Piotr Kryst, Andrzej Tokarczyk, Łukasz Nyk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wojciech MalewskiSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 02-511 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3195-6905
Tomasz MileckiDepartment of Urology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.
Omar TayaraSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 02-511 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7212-9266
Sławomir PoletajewSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 02-511 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7664-9816
Piotr KrystSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 02-511 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2551-0296
Andrzej TokarczykSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 02-511 Warsaw, Poland.
Łukasz NykSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 02-511 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6502-1484

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major public health issue, as the second most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men. Many PCa cases are indolent and pose minimal risk, making active surveillance a suitable management approach. However, clinically significant prostate carcinoma (csPCa) can lead to serious health issues, including progression, metastasis, and death. Differentiating between insignificant prostate cancer (inPCa) and csPCa is crucial for determining appropriate treatment. Diagnosis of PCa primarily involves trans-perineal and transrectal systematic biopsies. Systematic transrectal prostate biopsy, which typically collects 10-12 tissue samples, is a standard method, but it can miss csPCa and is associated with some complications. Recent advancements, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies, have been suggested to improve risk stratification and reduce overtreatment of inPCa and undertreatment of csPCa, thereby enhancing patient quality of life and treatment outcomes. Guided biopsies are increasingly recommended for their ability to better detect high-risk cancers while reducing identification of low-risk cases. MRI-targeted biopsies, especially when used as an initial biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients and those under active surveillance, have become more common. Utilization of MRI-TB alone can decrease septic complications; however, the combining of targeted biopsies with perilesional sampling is recommended for optimal detection of csPCa. Future advancements in imaging and biopsy techniques, including AI-augmented lesion detection and robotic-assisted sampling, promise to further improve the accuracy and effectiveness of PCa detection.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstatebiopsy techniquesmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)MRI-targeted biopsyprostate cancerprostate cancer managementsystematic biopsytargeted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID39330011
PMCPMC11430858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.