ArticleDentistry journal2024
Histological Analysis of Oral Tissue Grafting: A Focus on Donor Site Selection.
Article in Dentistry journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of smoking on palatal thickness, density, and vascularization assessed by high-frequency ultrasonography.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Histological evaluation of palatal donor site healing with leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin versus collagen sponge.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- Evaluation of palatal donor site wound healing with concentrated growth factor after gingival graft procedures.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The science of dental tissue grafting is evolving, with an increased understanding of factors influencing graft behavior. Despite the widespread clinical use of soft tissue grafts, the histological characteristics of different gingival harvesting sites are still underexplored. This study aimed to fill this gap by analyzing 50 tissue samples harvested from 25 patients across three sites: the hard palate, maxillary tuberosity, and palatal rugae. Each sample underwent thorough histological and histomorphometric analysis. Conventional statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, while predictive modeling was conducted with RapidMiner Studio. The study identified significant histological differences among the graft sites, with notable variations in total graft height, epithelial height, and interdigitation perimeter. These findings underscore the importance of donor site selection in influencing graft success. Pair plots and principal component analysis (PCA) further highlighted the distinct histological features of each tissue type. The random forest classifier identified total graft height, epithelial height, and perimeter as the most influential factors in predicting graft site behavior. This study offers valuable insights into the histological characteristics of soft tissue grafts, potentially leading to more predictable clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.