ReviewDentistry journal2024
Correlation between Implant Surface Roughness and Implant Stability: A Systematic Review.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of implant surface modifications on long-term outcome of surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a systematic review.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical and radiographic evaluation of immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants at anterior maxilla: a randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Influence of Implant-Specific Characteristics on Insertion Torque and Primary Stability: An Ex Vivo Comparison of Two Implant Systems with a Shared Macrodesign.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Surface Engineering in Materials (2nd Edition).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of Reduced Cortical Bone Compression by Implant Macrogeometry on Peri-Implant Bone Healing: An In Vitro and In Vivo Experimental Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Multiscale Interface Engineering for Orthopedic and Dental Implants: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- A Predictive Bioengineering Model of Dental Implant Instability in Systemic Bone Disorders: A Periotest-Based Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Amino Silane High Positive Charge Layers: A Stable and Durable Alternative Based on Electrostatic Interactions for Titanium Applications, Combining Antimicrobial and Biological Properties.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Influence of alumina shot blasting induced roughness on bacterial adhesion to titanium.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Surface Characteristics and Their Influence on Osseointegration: A Scientometric Analysis with a Focus on Dental Implants.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025Review
- The Topography of Titanium in Dental Implants: Key to Osseointegration and Bactericidal Capacity.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ablative and Expansive Protocols for Bone Osteotomy in Rabbits.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Long-Term Clinical Study on Sandblasted-Acid-Etched Surface Dental Implants: 12-Year Follow-Up.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Radiographic Evaluation of Implant Stability and Osseointegration in Adult Orthodontic Patients : Radiographic Evaluation of Implant Stability and Osseointegration.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
- Comparison of primary and secondary stability of a one-piece compressive conometric implant system in the posterior upper and lower jaws.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Preliminary Aspects Regarding the Anticorrosive Effect of Multi-Layered Silane-Hydroxyapatite Coatings Deposited on Titanium Grade 2 for Medical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to find in the literature data on the relationship between implant surface roughness and implant stability achieved, from the time of placement to three months afterward, to help us to know what type of surface roughness is more favorable to guarantee implant stability and osseointegration. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) statement, and the protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework. The specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected using the PICOS framework. The databases Medline (PubMed), Scopus, the Web of Science and The Cochrane Library were searched up to October 2023. The selection of studies and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers. The review included a total of 11 studies. A total of 1331 dental implant placements were identified. Two of the eleven selected studies were on humans in vivo, eight were on animals in vivo, and one was on animals in vitro. A statistically significant correlation between surface roughness and implant stability as measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was not identified in ten of the eleven selected studies. It appears that there is no correlation between primary stability and the degree of implant roughness. However, there appears to be a correlation between the roughness of the implant and the degree of osseointegration, as indicated by bone-implant contact values. This correlation is more closely related to secondary stability. The great methodological variability makes it difficult to compare data and draw conclusions, so it would be desirable to agree on a common methodology to help draw appropriate conclusions from published studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.