Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39329716›Full record

ReviewCells2024

Immunopathology of Corneal Allograft Rejection and Donor-Specific Antibodies (DSAs) as Immunological Predictors of Corneal Transplant Failure.

Natalia Olejkowska, Iwona Gorczyca, Marek Rękas, Marzena Garley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalia OlejkowskaIndependent Researcher, 00-001 Warsaw, Poland.
Iwona GorczycaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Szaserów 128, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.
Marek RękasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Szaserów 128, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.
Marzena GarleyDepartment of Immunology, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 15A, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6727-3850

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite tremendous developments in the field of laboratory testing in transplantation, the rules of eligibility for corneal transplantation still do not include typing of human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) in the donor and recipient or detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in the patient. The standard use of diagnostic algorithms is due to the cornea belonging to immunologically privileged tissues, which usually determines the success of transplantation of this tissue. A medical problem is posed by patients at high risk of transplant rejection, in whom the immune privilege of the eye is abolished and the risk of transplant failure increases. Critical to the success of transplantation in patients at high risk of corneal rejection may be the selection of an HLA-matched donor and recipient, and the detection of existing and/or de novo emerging DSAs in the patient. Incorporating the assessment of these parameters into routine diagnostics may contribute to establishing immune risk stratification for transplant rejection and effective personalized therapy for patients.

Indexed as

Corneal TransplantationGraft RejectionTissue DonorsAllograftsCorneaHLA AntigensHumansIsoantibodiesHLA AntigensIsoantibodiescorneadonor-specific antibodies (DSAs)human leukocyte antigens (HLAs)keratoplastyocular immune privilegetransplantation

Identifiers

PMID39329716
PMCPMC11430735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.