ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Deep Learning-Based Fine-Tuning Approach of Coarse Registration for Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Surgical Navigation Systems.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical Imaging for Biomedical Applications: From Rich Optical Contrast to Reliable Clinical Information.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Coarse-to-Fine Framework with Curvature Feature Learning for Robust Point Cloud Registration in Spinal Surgical Navigation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate registration between medical images and patient anatomy is crucial for surgical navigation systems in minimally invasive surgeries. This study introduces a novel deep learning-based refinement step to enhance the accuracy of surface registration without disrupting established workflows. The proposed method integrates a machine learning model between conventional coarse registration and ICP fine registration. A deep-learning model was trained using simulated anatomical landmarks with introduced localization errors. The model architecture features global feature-based learning, an iterative prediction structure, and independent processing of rotational and translational components. Validation with silicon-masked head phantoms and CT imaging compared the proposed method to both conventional registration and a recent deep-learning approach. The results demonstrated significant improvements in target registration error (TRE) across different facial regions and depths. The average TRE for the proposed method (1.58 ± 0.52 mm) was significantly lower than that of the conventional (2.37 ± 1.14 mm) and previous deep-learning (2.29 ± 0.95 mm) approaches (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.