Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39329676›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Tailoring Plasmonic Nanoheaters Size for Enhanced Theranostic Agent Performance.

Túlio de L Pedrosa, Gabrielli M F de Oliveira, Arthur C M V Pereira, Mariana J B da S Crispim, Luzia A da Silva, Marcilene S da Silva, Ivone A de Souza, Ana M M de A Melo, Anderson S L Gomes, Renato E de Araujo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Túlio de L PedrosaLaboratory of Biomedical Optics and Imaging, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50740-540, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9483-4644
Gabrielli M F de OliveiraLaboratory of Biomedical Optics and Imaging, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50740-540, Brazil.
Arthur C M V PereiraDepartment of Physics, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.
Mariana J B da S CrispimLaboratory of Biomedical Optics and Imaging, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50740-540, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0001-2342-2252
Luzia A da SilvaGraduate Program in Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-420, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8623-3045
Marcilene S da SilvaLaboratory of Pharmacology and Experimental Cancerology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50740-521, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9332-3911
Ivone A de SouzaLaboratory of Pharmacology and Experimental Cancerology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50740-521, Brazil.
Ana M M de A MeloDepartment of Biophysics and Radiobiology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-6472
Anderson S L GomesDepartment of Physics, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6536-6570
Renato E de AraujoLaboratory of Biomedical Optics and Imaging, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50740-540, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2026-070X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of optimized nanoheaters, which function as theranostic agents integrating both diagnostic and therapeutic processes, holds significant promise in the medical field. Therefore, developing strategies for selecting and utilizing optimized plasmonic nanoheaters is crucial for the effective use of nanostructured biomedical agents. This work elucidates the use of the Joule number (Jo) as a figure of merit to identify high-performance plasmonic theranostic agents. A framework for optimizing metallic nanoparticles for heat generation was established, uncovering the size dependence of plasmonic nanoparticles optical heating. Gold nanospheres (AuNSs) with a diameter of 50 nm and gold nanorods (AuNRs) with dimensions of 41×10 nm were identified as effective nanoheaters for visible (530 nm) and infrared (808 nm) excitation. Notably, AuNRs achieve higher Jo values than AuNSs, even when accounting for the possible orientations of the nanorods. Theoretical results estimate that 41×10 nm gold nanorods have an average Joule number of 80, which is significantly higher compared to larger rods. The photothermal performance of optimal and suboptimal nanostructures was evaluated using photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy procedures. The photoacoustic images indicate that, despite having larger absorption cross-sections, the large nanoparticle volume of bigger particles leads to less efficient conversion of light into heat, which suggests that the use of optimized nanoparticles promotes higher contrast, benefiting photoacoustic-based procedures in diagnostic applications. The photothermal therapy procedure was performed on S180-bearing mice inoculated with 41×10 nm and 90×25 nm PEGylated AuNRs. Five minutes of laser irradiation of tumor tissue with 41×10 nm produced an approximately 9.5% greater temperature rise than using 90×25 AuNRs in the therapy trials. Optimizing metallic nanoparticles for heat generation may reduce the concentration of the nanoheaters used or decrease the light fluence for bioscience applications, paving the way for the development of more economical theranostic agents.

Indexed as

gold nanoparticlesphotoacoustic imagingphotothermal therapyS180 cellssize optimization

Identifiers

PMID39329676
PMCPMC11428745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.