Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39329675›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Artifact Management for Cerebral Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Signals: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Tobias Bergmann, Nuray Vakitbilir, Alwyn Gomez, Abrar Islam, Kevin Y Stein, Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi, Logan Froese, Frederick A Zeiler

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tobias BergmannBiomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada.
Nuray VakitbilirBiomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2764-145X
Alwyn GomezSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3737-2065
Abrar IslamBiomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada.
Kevin Y SteinBiomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada.
Amanjyot Singh SainbhiBiomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3231-5683
Logan FroeseDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6076-0189
Frederick A ZeilerBiomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1737-0510

Funding

Endowed Manitoba Public Insurance (MPI) Chair in Neuroscience N/ANatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council DGECR-2022-00260, RGPIN-2022-03621, ALLRP-578524-22, ALLRP- 576386-22, I2IPJ 586104-23, and ALLRP 586244-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artifacts induced during patient monitoring are a main limitation for near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) as a non-invasive method of cerebral hemodynamic monitoring. There currently does not exist a robust "gold-standard" method for artifact management for these signals. The objective of this review is to comprehensively examine the literature on existing artifact management methods for cerebral NIRS signals recorded in animals and humans. A search of five databases was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The search yielded 806 unique results. There were 19 articles from these results that were included in this review based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. There were an additional 36 articles identified in the references of select articles that were also included. The methods outlined in these articles were grouped under two major categories: (1) motion and other disconnection artifact removal methods; (2) data quality improvement and physiological/other noise artifact filtering methods. These were sub-categorized by method type. It proved difficult to quantitatively compare the methods due to the heterogeneity of the effectiveness metrics and definitions of artifacts. The limitations evident in the existing literature justify the need for more comprehensive comparisons of artifact management. This review provides insights into the available methods for artifact management in cerebral NIRS and justification for a homogenous method to quantify the effectiveness of artifact management methods. This builds upon the work of two existing reviews that have been conducted on this topic; however, the scope is extended to all artifact types and all NIRS recording types. Future work by our lab in cerebral NIRS artifact management will lie in a layered artifact management method that will employ different techniques covered in this review (including dynamic thresholding, autoregressive-based methods, and wavelet-based methods) amongst others to remove varying artifact types.

Indexed as

artifact managementbio signal analysiscerebral hemodynamic monitoringcerebral near-infrared spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID39329675
PMCPMC11428271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.