ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Implicit Is Not Enough: Explicitly Enforcing Anatomical Priors inside Landmark Localization Models.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Special Issue on "Machine Learning-Aided Medical Image Analysis".Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The task of localizing distinct anatomical structures in medical image data is an essential prerequisite for several medical applications, such as treatment planning in orthodontics, bone-age estimation, or initialization of segmentation methods in automated image analysis tools. Currently, Anatomical Landmark Localization (ALL) is mainly solved by deep-learning methods, which cannot guarantee robust ALL predictions; there may always be outlier predictions that are far from their ground truth locations due to out-of-distribution inputs. However, these localization outliers are detrimental to the performance of subsequent medical applications that rely on ALL results. The current ALL literature relies heavily on implicit anatomical constraints built into the loss function and network architecture to reduce the risk of anatomically infeasible predictions. However, we argue that in medical imaging, where images are generally acquired in a controlled environment, we should use stronger explicit anatomical constraints to reduce the number of outliers as much as possible. Therefore, we propose the end-to-end trainable Global Anatomical Feasibility Filter and Analysis (GAFFA) method, which uses prior anatomical knowledge estimated from data to explicitly enforce anatomical constraints. GAFFA refines the initial localization results of a U-Net by approximately solving a Markov Random Field (MRF) with a single iteration of the sum-product algorithm in a differentiable manner. Our experiments demonstrate that GAFFA outperforms all other landmark refinement methods investigated in our framework. Moreover, we show that GAFFA is more robust to large outliers than state-of-the-art methods on the studied X-ray hand dataset. We further motivate this claim by visualizing the anatomical constraints used in GAFFA as spatial energy heatmaps, which allowed us to find an annotation error in the hand dataset not previously discussed in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.