ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Comparing the Immune Response to PEEK as an Implant Material with and without P-15 Peptide as Bone Graft Material in a Rabbit Long Bone Model.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polydopamine grafting polyether ether ketone to stabilize growth factor for efficient osteonecrosis repair.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bioinspired synthetic peptide-based biomaterials regenerate bone through biomimicking of extracellular matrix.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
P-15 is a 15-amino-acid-long biomimetic peptide widely demonstrated to enhance osteogenesis in vivo. Despite the prevalence of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) in interbody device manufacturing, a growing body of evidence suggests it may produce an unfavorable immune response. The purpose of this preliminary study was to characterize the immune response and new bone growth surrounding PEEK implants with and without a P-15 peptide-based osteobiologic. A bilateral femoral defect model was conducted using New Zealand white rabbits. A total of 17 test subjects received one implant in each distal femur, either with or without bone graft material. Animals were allowed to survive to 4 or 8 weeks, at which time the femurs were collected and subjected to micro-computer tomography (microCT) or cytokine analysis. MicroCT analysis included the quantification of bone growth and density surrounding each implant. The cytokine analysis of periprosthetic tissue homogenates included the quantification of interleukins (ILs) and TNF-α expression via ELISA kits. Improvements in bone volume were observed in the P-15 cohort for the regions of interest, 500-136 and 136-0 µm from the implant surface, at 8 weeks post-op. Concentrations of IL-1β, IL-4, and IL-6 cytokines were significantly higher in the P-15 cohort compared to the PEEK cohort at the 4-week timepoint. Significant reductions in the concentrations of IL-4 and IL-6 cytokines from the 4- to 8-week cohort were observed in the P-15 cohort only. The P-15 peptide has the potential to modulate the immune response to implanted materials. We observed improvements in bone growth and a more active micro-environment in the P-15 cohort relative to the PEEK control. This may indicate an earlier transition from the inflammatory to remodeling phase of healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.