Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39329639›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Improved Dipole Source Localization from Simultaneous MEG-EEG Data by Combining a Global Optimization Algorithm with a Local Parameter Search: A Brain Phantom Study.

Subrat Bastola, Saeed Jahromi, Rupesh Chikara, Steven M Stufflebeam, Mark P Ottensmeyer, Gianluca De Novi, Christos Papadelis, George Alexandrakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Noninvasive Biomarkers for Assessing the Excitatory/Inhibitory Imbalance in Children with Epilepsy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Subrat BastolaBioengineering Department, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
Saeed JahromiBioengineering Department, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
Rupesh ChikaraBioengineering Department, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
Steven M StufflebeamAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
Mark P OttensmeyerMedical Device & Simulation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8886-4556
Gianluca De NoviMedical Device & Simulation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Christos PapadelisBioengineering Department, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6125-9217
George AlexandrakisBioengineering Department, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7046-1924

Funding

Interictal High Frequency Oscillations of Epileptogenecity in Pediatric PatientsR01NS104116 · NINDS · COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER · PI PAPADELIS, CHRISTOS · 2019 to 2024
$2.4M
National Institute of Neurological Disorders & Stroke R01NS104116-01A1NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dipole localization, a fundamental challenge in electromagnetic source imaging, inherently constitutes an optimization problem aimed at solving the inverse problem of electric current source estimation within the human brain. The accuracy of dipole localization algorithms is contingent upon the complexity of the forward model, often referred to as the head model, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of measurements. In scenarios characterized by low SNR, often corresponding to deep-seated sources, existing optimization techniques struggle to converge to global minima, thereby leading to the localization of dipoles at erroneous positions, far from their true locations. This study presents a novel hybrid algorithm that combines simulated annealing with the traditional quasi-Newton optimization method, tailored to address the inherent limitations of dipole localization under low-SNR conditions. Using a realistic head model for both electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), it is demonstrated that this novel hybrid algorithm enables significant improvements of up to 45% in dipole localization accuracy compared to the often-used dipole scanning and gradient descent techniques. Localization improvements are not only found for single dipoles but also in two-dipole-source scenarios, where sources are proximal to each other. The novel methodology presented in this work could be useful in various applications of clinical neuroimaging, particularly in cases where recordings are noisy or sources are located deep within the brain.

Indexed as

dipole localizationEEGglobal optimizationMEGsimulated annealing

Identifiers

PMID39329639
PMCPMC11428344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.