ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Getting the Right Clones in an Automated Manner: An Alternative to Sophisticated Colony-Picking Robotics.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The knowledge driven DBTL cycle provides mechanistic insights while optimising dopamine production in Escherichia coli.Microbial cell factories · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, the design-build-test-learn (DBTL) cycle has become a key concept in strain engineering. Modern biofoundries enable automated DBTL cycling using robotic devices. However, both highly automated facilities and semi-automated facilities encounter bottlenecks in clone selection and screening. While fully automated biofoundries can take advantage of expensive commercially available colony pickers, semi-automated facilities have to fall back on affordable alternatives. Therefore, our clone selection method is particularly well-suited for academic settings, requiring only the basic infrastructure of a biofoundry. The automated liquid clone selection (ALCS) method represents a straightforward approach for clone selection. Similar to sophisticated colony-picking robots, the ALCS approach aims to achieve high selectivity. Investigating the time analogue of five generations, the model-based set-up reached a selectivity of 98 ± 0.2% for correctly transformed cells. Moreover, the method is robust to variations in cell numbers at the start of ALCS. Beside
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.