ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
AI-Powered Synthesis of Structured Multimodal Breast Ultrasound Reports Integrating Radiologist Annotations and Deep Learning Analysis.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women worldwide. B-mode ultrasound (US) is essential for early detection, offering high sensitivity and specificity without radiation exposure. This study introduces a semi-automatic method to streamline breast US report generation, aiming to reduce the burden on radiologists. Our method synthesizes comprehensive breast US reports by combining the extracted information from radiologists' annotations during routine screenings with the analysis results from deep learning algorithms on multimodal US images. Key modules in our method include image classification using visual features (ICVF), type classification via deep learning (TCDL), and automatic report structuring and compilation (ARSC). Experiments showed that the proposed method reduced the average report generation time to 3.8 min compared to manual processes, even when using relatively low-spec hardware. Generated reports perfectly matched ground truth reports for suspicious masses without a single failure on our evaluation datasets. Additionally, the deep-learning-based algorithm, utilizing DenseNet-121 as its core model, achieved an overall accuracy of 0.865, precision of 0.868, recall of 0.847, F1-score of 0.856, and area under the receiver operating characteristics of 0.92 in classifying tissue stiffness in breast US shear-wave elastography (SWE-mode) images. These improvements not only streamline the report generation process but also allow radiologists to dedicate more time and focus on patient care, ultimately enhancing clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.