ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Movement-Based Prosthesis Control with Angular Trajectory Is Getting Closer to Natural Arm Coordination.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional myoelectric controls of trans-humeral prostheses fail to provide intuitive coordination of the necessary degrees of freedom. We previously showed that by using artificial neural network predictions to reconstruct distal joints, based on the shoulder posture and movement goals (i.e., position and orientation of the targeted object), participants were able to position and orient an avatar hand to grasp objects with natural arm performances. However, this control involved rapid and unintended prosthesis movements at each modification of the movement goal, impractical for real-life scenarios. Here, we eliminate this abrupt change using novel methods based on an angular trajectory, determined from the speed of stump movement and the gap between the current and the 'goal' distal configurations. These new controls are tested offline and online (i.e., involving participants-in-the-loop) and compared to performances obtained with a natural control. Despite a slight increase in movement time, the new controls allowed twelve valid participants and six participants with trans-humeral limb loss to reach objects at various positions and orientations without prior training. Furthermore, no usability or workload degradation was perceived by participants with upper limb disabilities. The good performances achieved highlight the potential acceptability and effectiveness of those controls for our target population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.