ReviewRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)2025
Download to heal: navigating the pixelated path of digital therapeutics in psychiatric care.
Review in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital therapeutics have evolved rapidly with technological advances in healthcare. Despite their increasing use, gaps remain in understanding their regulatory frameworks, integration, and efficacy for conditions like substance use disorder, insomnia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder. This study evaluates U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved digital therapeutics and explores their potential to revolutionize psychiatric treatments amid ongoing technological and regulatory changes. We conducted a comprehensive review of major databases, focusing on articles published until January 2024 about FDA-approved digital therapeutics. We excluded non-English articles, those lacking empirical data, and those focusing on non-FDA-approved therapeutics. Our analysis covered regulatory compliance, clinical outcomes, and integration with traditional treatments. A review of nine FDA-cleared digital therapeutics revealed benefits, such as improved treatment accessibility and potential reductions in healthcare costs. For example, through Somryst, a cognitive-behavioral therapy-based treatment for insomnia, over 40% of users overcame chronic insomnia, and 60% experienced improvements without adverse effects. However, challenges remain, including low provider adoption, inadequate insurance coverage, and high user dropout rates. While digital therapeutics enhance accessibility, they face regulatory challenges, reimbursement issues, and require robust clinical evidence. Success depends on collaboration among stakeholders to demonstrate value, ensure safety, and integrate them into existing healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.