Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39329300›Full record

Trial reportCancer2025

Does insulin resistance predict prostate cancer? Results from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer (REDUCE) Trial.

Renning Zheng, James P Daniels, Daniel M Moreira, Shakiba Eslamimehr, Alexis R Freedland, Lourdes Guerrios-Rivera, Jay H Fowke, Stephen J Freedland

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Renning ZhengSchool of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4286-2544
James P DanielsDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Daniel M MoreiraThe University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Shakiba EslamimehrDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Alexis R FreedlandSchool of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Lourdes Guerrios-RiveraDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3846-5105
Jay H FowkeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Stephen J FreedlandDepartment of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-6419

Funding

Training CoreTL1DK132768 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Elizabeta Nemeth · 2021 to 2026
$3.4M
Network CoreU2CDK129496 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEX BUI · 2021 to 2026
$2.9M
Genetic and Endocrine Pathways Linking Obesity with Prostate CancerR01CA121060 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FOWKE, JAY H. · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121060NIDDK NIH HHS TL1 DK132768NIDDK NIH HHS U2C DK129496NIH HHS TL1 DK132768NIH HHS U2C DK129496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrior studies testing the association between insulin resistance (IR) and prostate cancer (PC) risk are inconsistent. We examined the association between Homeostatic Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR; calculated from fasting baseline insulin and glucose) and PC in REDUCE, a 4-year randomized trial of dutasteride vs. placebo for PC prevention. EXPERIMENTAL

designAll patients had prestudy negative biopsies and underwent study mandated biopsies at 2 and 4 years regardless of prostate-specific antigen. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between log-transformed or categorized HOMA-IR scores and PC risk. Multinominal regression was used to assess associations between HOMA-IR scores and tumor grade (low grade [grade group 1]; high-grade [grade groups 2-5]).

resultsAmong 5430 REDUCE participants (1212 with PC; 856 low- and 356 high-grade), higher HOMA-IR was associated with lower PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; p = .03; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .04). When stratified by grade, HOMA-IR was significantly associated with reduced low-grade PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.84; 95% CI , 0.74-0.94; p = .003; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .002) but was unrelated to high-grade PC (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.21; p = .81; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .26). Results were similar in placebo and treatment arms.

conclusionsIn summary, higher HOMA-IR was associated with a reduced risk of low-grade PC but was not associated with high-grade disease. The mechanisms to explain these findings are unclear.

Indexed as

DutasterideInsulin ResistanceProstatic Neoplasms5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAgedAzasteroidsBlood GlucoseHumansInsulinMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Grading5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAzasteroidsBlood GlucoseDutasterideInsulinHomeostatic Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA‐IR)insulin resistanceprostate cancerrisk assessmenttumor grade

Identifiers

PMID39329300
PMCPMC11695152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.