ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2025
Evaluating the impact of different message strategies about OSA employed in the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Count on Sleep campaign.
Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health campaigns hold promise for promoting general awareness about obstructive sleep apnea. In 2023, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine developed a series of messages as part of their "Count on Sleep" campaign. Three distinct messaging strategies were employed in posts disseminated on Facebook: (1) positive outcome (benefits of obstructive sleep apnea treatment); (2) negative outcome (consequences of untreated obstructive sleep apnea); and (3) partner-focused. We evaluated Facebook analytics to explore which of the 3 strategies was most impactful. The impressions were highest for the positive outcome message (n = 120,062), followed by the negative outcome (n = 12,286) and partner-focused (n = 10,259) messages. Female users were more likely to engage with positive (39% vs 28%) and negative (34% vs 25%) message than males, but sexes were quite balanced in engagement with the partner-focused message (36% vs 36%). There was more engagement from older adults (65 years and older) than from younger adults across all message types. CITATION: Robbins R, Morkous SSW, Honaker S, Darby CV, DelRosso LM. Evaluating the impact of different message strategies about OSA employed in the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Count on Sleep campaign.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.