ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024
No difference in laxity, proprioception and neuromuscular control after suture-tape augmented ACL repair of acute proximal avulsions versus ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts in young, active population.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Arthroscopic primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament with internal brace ligament augmentation: a viable alternative to reconstruction? A systematic literature review and analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Knee proprioception following anterior cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026Review
- Comparison of cellular activity and gene expression in repaired versus reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments: A case-control study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- No difference in laxity, proprioception and neuromuscular control after suture-tape augmented ACL repair of acute proximal avulsions versus ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts in young, active population.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare results of suture-tape augmented anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair (internal bracing [IB]) and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with hamstring autograft in terms of laxity, proprioception and neuromuscular control. The hypothesis was that with strict indications IB may provide better results in proprioception and neuromuscular control. Methods: Patients with unilateral ACL injury treated with IB or ACLR with hamstring autograft were enroled in this retrospective study. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) in 30° and 90° of flexion was measured with Rolimeter. The joint position sense (JPS) test was performed in 30° and 60° of flexion using Biodex System 4Pro. The time-synchronized motion capture system and surface electromyography set were used during dynamic tasks to assess knee valgus and semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris (BF) activities. Comparisons between both techniques and operated versus contralateral healthy knees were performed. Results: The study groups involved 28 patients after ACLR (21.8 ± 4.8 years) and 20 patients after IB (25.8 ± 10.5 years) with the average follow-up 30 ± 18 and 28 ± 15 months, respectively. The ATT did not differ significantly between operated groups. In 30° of flexion ATT for ACLR was significantly higher in operated than in contralateral knee (5.8 ± 2.4 mm vs. 4.3 ± 1.3 mm, Conclusion: Suture-tape augmented ACL repair and ACLR with hamstring autograft yield similar results in terms of laxity, proprioception and neuromuscular control. Level of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.