ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2024
The application of intravenous general anesthesia under nasopharyngeal airway assisted ventilation undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: A prospective, single-center, controlled trial.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To observe the effect of intravenous general anesthesia under nasopharyngeal airway-assisted ventilation on patients undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. One hundred and twenty patients who underwent ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into nasopharyngeal airway group (research group) and laryngeal mask group (control group). These patients, respectively, received intravenous anesthesia under nasopharyngeal airway and laryngeal mask-assisted ventilation. The following evaluation indexes were compared and analyzed between the two groups, including anesthetic effect, hemodynamics, stress response, postoperative recovery, adverse reactions, etc. There were no significant differences in Visual Analog Scale, hemodynamics, and stress response between the two groups at each time point (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.