ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Safety assessment of sulfasalazine: a pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A tri-scale in silico framework integrating pharmacovigilance and mechanistic modeling suggests tepotinib-associated acute kidney injury risk.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Exploring the impacts of type 2 diabetes and metformin use on Parkinson's disease: Mendelian randomization analysis and a national cohort study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Temsirolimus safety evaluation: real-world adverse event analysis from the FDA adverse event reporting system database.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Re-evaluating the antibacterial properties of DMARD and pro-drug sulphasalazine against autoimmune bacterial triggers after eighty years.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Spectrum and signals of medication-associated cognitive disorder: a comprehensive disproportionality analysis with cross-database validation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Repurposing loratadine to induce ferroptosis and overcome multidrug resistance: preclinical evidence in KB-V-1 cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors of severe myelosuppression in rheumatoid arthritis patients with csDMARD non-adherence: a case series.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Inactivated Cells and Metabolites ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and Evaluation of Hydrogel-Based Sulfasalazine-Loaded Nanosponges for Enhanced Topical Psoriasis Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An integrated machine learning framework for developing and validating diagnostic models and drug predictions based on ulcerative colitis genes.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Baricitinib in chronic kidney disease: an exploratory analysis integrating network toxicology, molecular docking and pharmacovigilance.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Adverse drug events associated with tiotropium: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system database.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2025Article
- Literature review of the clinical features of sulfasalazine-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sulfasalazine is a widely used anti-inflammatory medication for treating autoimmune disorders such as ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease, and rheumatoid arthritis. However, its safety profile has not been systematically evaluated in real-world settings. By analyzing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we identified risk signals associated with adverse reactions to sulfasalazine, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making and risk management. Methods: Reports of adverse events (AEs) associated with sulfasalazine, covering the period from Q1 2004 to Q4 2023, were extracted from the FAERS database. Detailed case information was aggregated to assess demographic characteristics. The associations between sulfasalazine and adverse events were evaluated using the Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM). Results: We extracted 7,156 adverse event reports from the FAERS database where sulfasalazine was identified as the "Primary Suspect (PS)" drug. Using disproportionality analysis, we identified 101 preferred terms (PT) related to sulfasalazine across 24 organ systems. Notable adverse reactions consistent with the drug's labeling were observed, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, agranulocytosis, eosinophilic pneumonia, and crystalluria. Additionally, novel positive signals not previously documented in the drug label were identified, including acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, aseptic meningitis, glomerulonephritis, and hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma. Conclusion: Most of the adverse reaction findings in this study are consistent with previous clinical research, and we have also identified new potential AEs associated with sulfasalazine. These findings provide valuable insights for the safety monitoring and clinical application of sulfasalazine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.