Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39329015›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2024

Comparative efficacy of intratympanic gentamicin and intratympanic corticosteroid in the treatment of Meniere's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xuanmei Wu, Jiacheng Shui, Chengyuan Liu, Xinyue Wu, Ying Yu, Hanyu Wang, Cong Yan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Immunological mechanisms in Meniere's disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xuanmei WuSchool of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jiacheng ShuiEye Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chengyuan LiuEye Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xinyue WuSchool of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ying YuSchool of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Hanyu WangSchool of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Cong YanSchool of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of gentamicin compared to corticosteroids for the treatment of Meniere's disease. Methods: An extensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until May 2024. For continuous outcomes, pooled effect estimates were determined by calculating the weighted mean difference (WMD), while for binary outcomes, the risk ratio (RR) was used, each accompanied by their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed using Cochran's Results: A total of 12 studies were selected, involving 694 patients. Our analysis found that the gentamicin group demonstrates superior vertigo control rates compared to the corticosteroid group (RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.65, Conclusion: Our study suggests that the intratympanic gentamicin group achieves higher vertigo control rates, whereas the corticosteroid group demonstrates better improvement in pure tone averages. However, the high heterogeneity in vertigo control rates warrants caution. Larger sample-sized randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate these findings.

Indexed as

efficacyintratympanic corticosteroidintratympanic gentamicinMeniere’s diseasemeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39329015
PMCPMC11424416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.