ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Arithmetic in two languages: Localizing simple multiplication processing in the adult bilingual brain.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural Basis of Simple Arithmetic Processing in a Native and Second Language.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Verbally memorized multiplication tables are thought to create language-specific memories. Supporting this idea, bilinguals are typically faster and more accurate in the language in which they learned math (LA+) than in their other language (LA- ) . No study has yet revealed the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms explaining this effect, or the role of problem size in explaining the recruitment of different brain regions in LA+ and LA- . To fill this gap in the literature, 29 Spanish-English early bilingual adults, proficient in both languages, verified simple multiplication problems in each language while functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was acquired. More specifically, this study aimed to answer two questions: 1) Does LA+ recruit left superior and middle temporal gyri (STG/MTG) to a greater extent than LA- , reflecting more robust verbal representations of multiplication facts in LA+? In contrast, does LA- recruit the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), reflecting more effortful retrieval, or the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), reflecting reliance on quantity processes? 2) Is there an interaction between language and problem size, where language differences are more pronounced for less practiced, large multiplication problems (e.g., 8 × 9) in comparison to more familiar, small problems (e.g., 2 × 3). Functional localizer tasks were used to identify hypothesis-driven regions of interest in verbal areas associated with verbal representations of arithmetic facts (left STG/MTG) and with the effortful retrieval of these facts (left IFG) and quantity areas engaged when calculation-based strategies are used (bilateral IPS). In planned analyses, no cluster reached significance for the direct comparison of languages (question 1) or for the interaction between language and problem size (question 2). An exploratory analysis found a main effect of problem size, where small problems recruited left STG/MTG and left IFG to a greater extent than large problems, suggesting greater verbal involvement for these problems in both languages. Additionally, large problems recruited right IPS to a greater extent than small problems, suggesting reliance on quantity processes. Our results suggest that proficient early bilingual adults engage similar brain regions in both languages, even for more difficult, large problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.