Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39328826›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Phase I Study of Intravitreal Injection of Autologous CD34+ Stem Cells from Bone Marrow in Eyes with Vision Loss from Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Susanna S Park, Gerhard Bauer, Brian Fury, Mehrdad Abedi, Nicholas Perotti, Dane Colead-Bergum, Jan A Nolta

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03981549 (Phase I/II Randomized, Prospective, Double-masked, Sham-controlled Study of Intravitreal Autologous Bone Marrow CD34+ Stem Cell Therapy for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03981549 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Phase I/II Randomized, Prospective, Double-masked, Sham-controlled Study of Intravitreal Autologous Bone Marrow CD34+ Stem Cell Therapy for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Emmes Company, LLCRan2019 to 2023Enrolled16ConditionsCentral Retinal Vein OcclusionArmsAutologous Bone Marrow CD34+ Stem Cells, Sham Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susanna S ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, California.
Gerhard BauerStem Cell Program, Institute for Regenerative Cures, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California.
Brian FuryStem Cell Program, Institute for Regenerative Cures, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California.
Mehrdad AbediDivision of Hematology Oncology and Malignant Hematology/Cellular Therapy and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California.
Nicholas PerottiStem Cell Program, Institute for Regenerative Cures, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California.
Dane Colead-BergumStem Cell Program, Institute for Regenerative Cures, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California.
Jan A NoltaStem Cell Program, Institute for Regenerative Cures, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of intravitreal injection of autologous CD34+ stem cells from bone marrow (BMSCs) in eyes with vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Design: Phase I prospective, open-label, single-center study. Participants: Seven eyes (7 patients) with RP with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/60 to 20/400 or visual field constriction to within 10°. Methods: A comprehensive examination with ETDRS BCVA, macular OCT, perimetry, and fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline, 1 to 3 months, and 6 months after study treatment. Bone marrow aspiration, isolation of CD34+ BMSCs under good manufacturing practice conditions, and intravitreal cell injection were performed on the same day. The CD34+ cells were isolated from bone marrow using a Ficoll gradient and the Miltenyi CliniMACS system. Isolated CD34+ cells were released for clinical use if viability, sterility, and purity met the release criteria accepted by the United States Food and Drug Administration for this clinical study. Main Outcome Measures: Number of CD34+ cells isolated for injection and adverse events associated with study treatment during follow-up. Secondary outcome measures are changes in BCVA and perimetry. Results: All isolated CD34+ cells passed the release criteria. A mean of 3.26 ± 0.66 million viable CD34+ cells (range 1.6 to 7.05 million) were injected intravitreally per eye. No adverse event was noted during the study follow-up except for 1 participant who was noted with transient cells in the anterior chamber with mild elevation in intraocular pressure at 18 hours after study injection which normalized by 24 hours. Best-corrected visual acuity remained within 2 lines of baseline or improved in all participants at 6 months follow-up. Perimetry was stable or improved in all eyes during study follow-up except 1 eye with transient improvement at 1 month and worsening of both eyes at 6 months. Conclusions: Intravitreal injection of autologous CD34+ BMSCs is feasible and appears to be well tolerated in eyes with vision loss from RP. A larger randomized prospective study would be needed to evaluate further the safety and potential efficacy of this cell therapy for vision loss associated with RP. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Bone marrow stem cellsCD34+ cellsIntravitreal stem cell therapyRetinal degenerationRetinitis pigmentosa

Identifiers

PMID39328826
PMCPMC11426125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.