Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39328749›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2024

Bridging Machine Learning and Thermodynamics for Accurate p

Weiliang Luo, Gengmo Zhou, Zhengdan Zhu, Yannan Yuan, Guolin Ke, Zhewei Wei, Zhifeng Gao, Hang Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. EasyDock 1.3: An Automated Pipeline for Molecular Docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Unifying pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  4. Benchmarking pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predictive free energy simulations through hierarchical distillation of quantum Hamiltonians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Interpretable Deep-Learning pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  14. pKJournal of computational chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weiliang LuoDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6150-2797
Gengmo ZhouDP Technology, Beijing 100089, China.
Zhengdan ZhuDP Technology, Beijing 100089, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9260-6226
Yannan YuanDP Technology, Beijing 100089, China.
Guolin KeDP Technology, Beijing 100089, China.
Zhewei WeiGaoling School of Artificial Intelligence, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Zhifeng GaoDP Technology, Beijing 100089, China.
Hang ZhengDP Technology, Beijing 100089, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating scientific principles into machine learning models to enhance their predictive performance and generalizability is a central challenge in the development of AI for Science. Herein, we introduce Uni-p

Identifiers

PMID39328749
PMCPMC11423309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.