ReviewCureus2024
Comparing the Efficacy of Ondansetron, Domperidone, and Metoclopramide in Treating Vomiting in Pediatric Patients With Acute Gastroenteritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Italian multidisciplinary delphi consensus on home management of nausea and vomiting in children with acute gastroenteritis (NoEmesi Project).Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy of ondansetron, domperidone, and metoclopramide in managing vomiting in pediatric acute gastroenteritis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase, from their inception to July 25, 2024. Additionally, Google Scholar was searched to identify further relevant studies. In total, 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The primary outcome was cessation of vomiting. The results indicated that ondansetron was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving cessation of vomiting. While domperidone and metoclopramide also showed improved efficacy compared to placebo, these differences were not statistically significant. Ondansetron emerged as the most effective intervention, followed by domperidone and metoclopramide. These findings have significant clinical implications, suggesting that ondansetron should be the preferred antiemetic for pediatric acute gastroenteritis. Its use may reduce the need for intravenous rehydration and hospitalization, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. However, the study has limitations, including a lack of data on secondary outcomes and safety profiles of the interventions. Future prospective, multicenter studies are needed to assess both the efficacy and safety of these antiemetics comprehensively in pediatric acute gastroenteritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.