ArticleCureus2024
Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators Leading to Liver Injury: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Limitations of Molecular Docking in Predicting the Selectivity of Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs): A Comparative Study of YK11 and Ostarine Across Five Nuclear Receptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- Preclinical assessment of the selective androgen receptor modulator RAD140 to increase muscle mass and bone mineral density.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Silent Threats to the Liver: Acute Hepatotoxicity Attributed to Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs).Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) have gained popularity for their alleged ability to selectively target androgen receptors, potentially offering muscle-building benefits with fewer side effects than traditional steroids. However, the safety profile of SARMs, including RAD-140, is not fully understood. This case report presents a 29-year-old male who developed liver injury after taking RAD-140. The patient experienced jaundice and elevated liver enzymes after three months of RAD-140 use. A liver ultrasound revealed hepatic steatosis and a hyperechoic lesion. Symptoms resolved after discontinuing RAD-140. Similar cases of liver injury associated with RAD-140 have been reported, highlighting the potential hepatotoxicity of this SARM. Discontinuation of RAD-140 appears to reverse liver injury, but the long-term effects and risks of SARM use remain unclear. This case highlights the need for caution and monitoring when considering SARMs for performance enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.