ArticleCureus2024
Skin Adhesive Tapes: An Effective Wound Closure Method for Percutaneous Vertebral Body Stenting.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Skin adhesive tapes (SATs) are hypoallergenic adhesive tapes commonly used for wound closure in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Vertebral body stenting (VBS) is a metallic balloon-expandable stent used to treat vertebral body fractures. Its balloon and stent deployment involves a larger stab incision and pedicle bore tract than PVP, increasing the risk of bleeding and wound complications. This study evaluated the outcome and complications of VBS wound closure with SAT and the reasons for conversion to conventional suture closure (SC). Material and methods A retrospective series of patients who underwent VBS from May 2019 to March 2021 were identified from review of computerized medical records. Data were collected for wound closure method, reason for SC, number of operative levels, postoperative wound complications of contact dermatitis, tension blisters, tape dislodgement, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, symptomatic hematoma and return to operating theater. The wounds were assessed for complete healing and cosmesis at outpatient follow-up visits. Results A total of 36 patients were identified. SAT closure was performed in 33 (91.6%) patients, while SC was performed in three (8.3%) patients. Unplanned conversion to SC was required in two (5.5%) patients due to continued intraoperative wound bleeding, while one (2.7%) patient had planned SC as part of a staged operation. Uneventful closures occurred in 32 (97.0%) of SAT closures. One (3%) SAT closure patient developed postoperative blood-soaked dressings and tape dislodgement, requiring reapplication of the SATs at the ward with uneventful recovery thereafter. No patient with SAT closure developed contact dermatitis, tension blisters, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, symptomatic hematoma, or required return to theater. All SAT closure patients had complete wound healing at outpatient follow-up at six weeks. No SAT closure was found to be cosmetically unacceptable or required wound revision for any reason at up to one year postoperatively. Conclusion SATs are a safe and reliable means of wound closure for VBS. Conversion to SC due to continued intraoperative wound site bleeding is rarely required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.