ArticleCureus2024
Anatomical Variations of the Cystic Artery and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Persisting Surgical Challenge.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The anatomy and surgical implications of the middle hepatic artery: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Pooled it
- Intraoperative Variations of Cystic Artery and Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.ANZ journal of surgeryPooled it
- SafeChole4all: pilot validation of a novel curriculum for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy training.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common surgical procedure, it can become challenging due to multiple variants of the anatomy of both cystic artery and cystic bile duct. A 52-year-old male with a history of symptomatic cholelithiasis underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. During preparation of the Calot's triangle in order to achieve the "critical view of safety", an uncommon variation of the arterial anatomy was detected. The cystic artery was found to be originating from a robust middle hepatic artery instead of the right hepatic artery. The retrograde manner of cholecystectomy helped the visualization and protection of the middle hepatic artery. This anatomic finding was confirmed per CT done postoperatively. This case constitutes a rare arterial variation, in which the cystic artery arises from the middle hepatic artery, the artery that supplies the hepatic segment IV, which itself constituted a rare variation, since it arose from the anterior branch of the right hepatic artery. This artery could be falsely ligated instead of the real cystic artery. Certain techniques can be used to enhance the surgeon's ability to distinguish and safely ligate the proper entities. Anatomic knowledge of the possible variations of arterial and bile vessels is crucial for intraoperative recognition. Dissection of the Calot's triangle and reassurance of the "critical view of safety" are mandatory dissection techniques during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Additionally, the retrograde manner of cholecystectomy can be of significant help in case of unclear anatomy in order to avoid ligation of uncertain entities during dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.