ArticleCureus2024
Surgical Management of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Survey of Current Practice and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using a Dermal Allograft Versus Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Aged <70 Years: A Comparative Study With Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of full arthroscopic combined latissimus dorsi and teres major transfers for irreparable subscapularis tears.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are a complex challenge encountered by shoulder surgeons. Despite a range of repair strategies, the preferences and indications of these remain unclear. Our study aims to identify current practices, preference for graft choice and indications for capsular reconstruction amongst UK-based surgeons. Methods An online survey was sent to members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS). Procedural preferences, operative frequency, indications/contra-indications for superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and graft choice were ascertained. An independent t-test was used to determine statistical significance. Results One hundred and ten upper limb surgeons responded to the survey. Of this cohort, 90/110 (81.8%) would be able to perform a partial cuff repair, 89/110 (80.9%) could offer a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and 82/110 (74.6%) could perform debridement only. Less commonly, 35/110 (31.8%) could offer an Inspace
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.