Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39328580›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2024

Assessing sterility techniques in bronchodilator responsiveness testing by practicing allergists in North America.

Kabir Chhabra, Dhruva Gupta, Neel Singh, Naba Sharif, Sudhir Sekhsaria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kabir ChhabraUniversity of Maryland Hospital, Baltimore, Md.
Dhruva GuptaHarvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Neel SinghMedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Md.
Naba SharifPenn Medicine-Becker ENT & Allergy, Princeton, NJ.
Sudhir SekhsariaMedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Md.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The American Thoracic Society has published general guidelines for sterility when testing for bronchodilator responsiveness. However, the extent to which practicing allergists implement sterility measures is currently unknown. Objective: This study aims to understand the adherence to the American Thoracic Society guidelines for sterility among practicing allergists. Methods: In 2015, a questionnaire was approved and distributed by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology to all its members. The anonymous responses were recorded and tabulated after a 3-week period. Results: Of the 6800 allergists who received surveys from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology members, 496 participated in the survey (response rate 7.3%). Using metered dose inhalers with a spacer and nebulizers were the most common bronchodilator administration techniques, as indicated by 59.35% and 58.52% of responses, respectively. Whereas 69.25% of the allergists considered their bronchodilator administration techniques to be sterile, 14.05% did not consider their administration technique to be sterile and 16.70% were unsure. For maintaining sterility, 38.75% of the respondents indicated using a new disposable attachment for reused inhalers, 18.71% indicated using a new inhaler for each patient, and 9.13% reported wiping inhalers with a cleaning agent. Conclusions: When asked about the sterility of the techniques used by them, nearly one-third of the allergists either stated that the measures used by them were unsterile or stated that they were were unsure. To increase adherence to sterility measures among North American allergists, promoting guideline awareness and proposing updated guidelines focused on the most common bronchodilator administration techniques is essential.

Indexed as

allergistsasthmaBronchodilator reversibility testingsterility

Identifiers

PMID39328580
PMCPMC11426031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.