ArticleHeliyon2024
Mechanical and physical characteristics of concrete mixed with sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of Recycled Concrete Aggregate and Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Concrete: A Systematic Review of Mechanical, Physical, and Durability Characteristics.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A robust LightGBM model for concrete tensile strength forecast to aid in resilience-based structure strategies.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Mechanical and physical characteristics of concrete mixed with sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to produce sustainable concrete by reducing reliance on cement, which contributes to high carbon footprints, and natural sand, which is being depleted. Sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) was used to partially replace cement at 5 %, 10 %, and 15 %, while recycled polyethylene terephthalate (RPET) was used to partially replace sand at 5 %, 10 %, 15 %, and 20 %. The effects of these substitutions on concrete's mechanical and physical properties were examined after 28 days of water curing. The study observed a decrease in fresh density by 0.36 %-2.67 % with SCBA and RPET inclusion. The slump values ranged between 93 mm and 140 mm, indicating good workability. The reference concrete's compressive strength was 39.65 MPa, while the mix with 5 % SCBA and 10 % RPET achieved 38.23 MPa. This mix also showed a 1.2 % higher split tensile strength than the reference concrete. Although the reference concrete's flexural strength was the highest at 4.56 MPa, all SCBA-RPET mixes remained within 86 % of this value. All modified mixes weighed less than the reference concrete, with the compressive strength-to-weight ratio of the mix with 5 % SCBA and 10 % RPET being closest to the reference mix with only a 2.44 % reduction. These findings suggest that SCBA and RPET can be effectively used to produce sustainable concrete with comparable mechanical properties to conventional concrete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.