ReviewHeliyon2024
Advanced porous hip implants: A comprehensive review.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capturing the Multiscale Nature of Bone Behavior: Classical, Data-Driven and Hybrid Techniques.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Toward next-generation hip implants: From failure mechanisms to translational design.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Multiscale Interface Engineering for Orthopedic and Dental Implants: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Bone-Ti-Alloy Interaction in Hip Arthroplasty of Patients with Diabetes, Dyslipidaemia, and Kidney Dysfunction: Three Case Reports and Brief Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Experimental Framework for the Setup and Validation of Individualized Bone Conduction Hearing Computational Models.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Impact of Cementation Technique Variations on Femoral Stem Stability: An In Vitro Polyurethane Model Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A Neural Network-Accelerated Approach for Orthopedic Implant Design and Evaluation Through Strain Shielding Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 3D-printed hip prostheses with regenerative integration: a state-of-the-art comprehensive review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of orthopaedic implants has experienced significant advancements in recent years, transforming the approach to orthopaedic treatments. Amongst these advancements, porous structures have emerged as a promising solution to address the limitations of traditional solid implants. This comprehensive review paper offers a thorough overview of the importance of advanced porous hip implants, focusing on three key areas bone morphology and biomechanical parameters, complications associated with solid implants, and the benefits of porous structures and porous implants. Understanding the intricate interplay between bone morphology and biomechanical parameters is crucial when designing orthopaedic implants. Mimicking the native bone structure ensures optimal osseointegration, load distribution, and long-term success. Porous implants closely resemble natural bone structures, facilitating improved integration and biomechanical compatibility. Complications with solid implants are a significant concern in orthopaedic procedures. Stress shielding, cortical hypertrophy, and micromotion can lead to implant failure or revision surgeries. By contrast, porous structures promise to mitigate these issues by promoting bone ingrowth, reducing stress concentrations, and providing stability at the bone-implant interface. The benefits of porous structures and porous implants go beyond addressing solid implant complications. These structures enhance bone in-growth potential, strengthening integration and long-term stability. The interconnected porosity promotes nutrient diffusion and new blood vessel formation, supporting healing and minimizing infection risk. Furthermore, porous implants exhibit improved mechanical properties, such as lower elastic modulus and higher energy absorption, that better match those of bone. This feature helps alleviate stress shielding and enhances the overall performance and longevity of the implant. In conclusion, advanced porous implants have tremendous potential in orthopaedics. By closely mimicking native bone structure and reducing complications associated with solid implants, they can revolutionize orthopaedic treatments. Further research and development are warranted to fully exploit the potential of these innovative solutions and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.