ArticleHeliyon2024
Enhancing heart disease diagnosis through ECG image vectorization-based classification.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Heart Disease Diagnosis Using ECG Signal Reconstruction and Deep Transfer Learning Classification with Optional SVM Integration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart disease is a major issue, and the severity of its effects can be reduced through early detection and prevention. ECG is an effective diagnostic tool. Automating ECG analysis increases the possibility of timely analysis and prediction of heart conditions, improving patient outcomes. The extraction of heart-related features further enhances the accuracy of ECG-based classification models, paving the way for more effective and efficient online detection and prevention of heart diseases. The image-vectorization technique suggested in this study produces a vector representation that precisely captures the distinctive features of the heart signal. It involves image cropping, erasing the ECG grid lines, and assigning pixels to distinguish the heart signal from the background. Compared to the feature vector produced by VGG16, the extracted feature vector is 589 times shorter than the feature vector produced by VGG16, which significantly decreased the amount of memory required, increased algorithm convergence, and required less computing power. The feature vector extracted using image-vectorization is used to create the training dataset, which is used to train artificial neural networks (ANNs). The results demonstrate that using image-vectorization techniques improved the performance of machine learning algorithms compared to using conventional feature extraction algorithms like CNNs and VGG16.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.