Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39328402›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2024

A Simulation to Improve Understanding and Communication of Ethical Dilemmas That Surround Brain Death.

Nicholas Ludka, Ngan Nguyen, Daniel Menkes, Abram Brummett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas LudkaFourth-Year Medical Student, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0003-0410-7617
Ngan NguyenAssistant Professor, Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine.
Daniel MenkesProfessor, Department of Neurology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine.
Abram BrummettAssistant Professor, Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Providers across multiple specialties may be called upon to perform brain death assessments at hospitals that lack specialty neurology or critical care services. To address this need, we developed a brain death curriculum involving simulation and group discussion to prepare medical trainees for brain death testing and communication with surrogate decision-makers. Methods: A 1-hour session was delivered to trainees rotating through the intensive care unit at William Beaumont University Hospital. One trainee per session participated in a simulation involving a brain-dead patient (SimMan 3G Mannequin) and spouse (confederate) while the remainder of the cohort observed from a separate room. The trainee briefed the spouse about the brain death examination, performed the examination, and communicated their findings. Afterward, the cohort discussed the history, law, and common ethical and communication issues that surround brain death. Results: A total of 35 trainees participated from August 2022 to March 2023. After the session, trainees were more comfortable performing brain death testing ( Discussion: The simulation had a positive impact on medical trainees' ability to perform brain death testing and their comfort level in discussing complex ethical issues that surround brain death. Our results support continued simulation training for medical trainees to better prepare them for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Brain DeathCommunicationCurriculumAdultFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsInternship and ResidencyMaleSimulation TrainingBrain DeathCase-Based LearningClinical Skills Assessment/OSCEsCommunication SkillsCritical Care MedicineEnd of Life/Palliative CareHospice & Palliative MedicineInterdisciplinary MedicinePhilosophyQuantitative ResearchSimulation

Identifiers

PMID39328402
PMCPMC11424717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.