Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39328395›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024

Disability inclusion in national surveys.

Caroline Cerilli, Varshini Varadaraj, Jennifer Choi, Fiona Sweeney, Franz Castro, Scott D Landes, Bonnielin K Swenor

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caroline CerilliDisability Health Research Center, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0892-2515
Varshini VaradarajDisability Health Research Center, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-1316
Jennifer ChoiSchool of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Fiona SweeneySchool of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2074-5611
Franz CastroDisability Health Research Center, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9913-4257
Scott D LandesAging Studies Institute, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2151-7805
Bonnielin K SwenorDisability Health Research Center, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National surveys are important for understanding the disparities that disabled people experience across social determinants of health; however, limited research has examined the methods used to include disabled people in these surveys. This study reviewed nationally representative surveys administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Census Bureau that collected data in the past 5 years and sampled adults ≥18 years. Data from both publicly available online survey documents and a questionnaire emailed to survey administrators were used to determine whether surveys (1) oversampled disabled people, (2) had a data-accessibility protocol to support data collection, and (3) provided multiple data-collection modalities (eg, phone, paper). Of the 201 surveys identified, 30 met the inclusion criteria for the study. Of these 30 surveys, 1 oversampled disabled people, none had a data-collection accessibility protocol, and 21 provided multiple data-collection modalities. This study highlights barriers and opportunities to including disabled people in national surveys, which is essential for ensuring survey data are generalizable to the US population.

Indexed as

accessibilitydisability inclusionequitynational surveys

Identifiers

PMID39328395
PMCPMC11426164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.