ReviewWorld journal of oncology2024
Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
Review in World journal of oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiofrequency Ablation for Early Stage Breast Cancer as a Potential Alternative to Partial Mastectomy: 5-Year Results from the Multiple-Center, Single-Arm, Phase 3 RAFAELO Study (NCCH1409).Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- Cryoablation in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety and Oncologic Outcomes.Cancers · 2026Review
- Emerging advances in non-surgical ablation for early-stage breast cancer.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Cryoablation-guided breast-conserving surgery: a single-center, retrospective study based on a propensity score-matched cohort.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Dose Constraints in Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy to Minimize the Risk of Pectoral Myositis.International journal of particle therapy · 2025Article
- Cryoablation in the treatment of early breast cancer: a comprehensive analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies, affecting millions of people worldwide annually. The treatment paradigm for early-stage breast cancer is in flux. The focus is now on opportunities to de-escalation treatment to minimize morbidity and maximize patients' quality of life. Recently, percutaneous minimally invasive ablative techniques have been explored. Early trials in small population of patients demonstrated cryoablation to be effective, safe, and well-tolerated in an outpatient setting. Subsequent surgical resection was performed and the ablation success rate was the highest if the tumor was less than 1.5 cm and with < 25% ductal carcinoma
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.