Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39328301›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy of different regions in the post-epidemic era: A causality deep learning approach.

Yang Liu, Chenxu Zhao, Chengzhi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang LiuSchool of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9410-1755
Chenxu ZhaoSchool of Computer Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Chengzhi ZhangDepartment of Information Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This paper aims to understand vaccine hesitancy in the post-epidemic era by analyzing texts related to vaccine reviews and public attitudes toward three prominent vaccine brands: Sinovac, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer, and exploring the relationship of vaccine hesitancy with the prevalence of epidemics in different regions. Methods: We collected 165629 Twitter user comments associated with the vaccine brands. The comments were labeled based on willingness and attitude toward vaccination. We utilize a causality deep learning model, the Bert multi-channel convolutional neural network (BertMCNN), to predict users' willingness and attitude mutually. Results: When applied to the provided dataset, the proposed BertMCNN model demonstrated superior performance to traditional machine learning algorithms and other deep learning models. It is worth noting that after March 2022, the public was more hesitant about the Sinovac vaccines. Conclusions: This study reveals a connection between vaccine hesitancy and the prevalence of the epidemic in different regions. The analytical results obtained from this method can assist governmental health departments in making informed decisions regarding vaccination strategies.

Indexed as

causality deep learningthe post-epidemic eraVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID39328301
PMCPMC11425787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.