ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024
Acetabular fracture in India: An epidemiological study.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolated screw fixation of posterior wall fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Epidemiological profile and factors associated with length of stay in patients with acetabular fractures at a level 1 trauma center in Nepal: a retrospective analytical study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- CT/MRI-based finite element model construction and biomechanical analysis of acetabular quadrilateral fractures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acetabular fractures, resulting from high-energy trauma, present significant orthopaedic challenges. Despite their rarity, the incidence of these fractures is rising, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of their epidemiological characteristics, especially in diverse populations like India. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 3643 patients across four level-1 trauma centers in India (North 1, North 2, West, and South) from January 2001 to December 2019. Prior ethical approval was obtained from the respective institutions. Data were collected using the computerized patient record system (CPRS) and included patients with complete clinical and radiological records. Only patients with full radiological data were included, comprising standard anteroposterior radiograph, Judet views on radiographs, and computed tomography scan of the pelvis. The study evaluated the demographic characteristics, fracture patterns and surgical approaches. Results: The majority of patients were males (84.05 %) and the fractures were mostly seen in young individuals between 19 and 40 years' age group (44.9 %), followed by 41-60 years (42.3 %). Associated bony or other system injuries were seen in 53.42 % of patients, with pelvic injuries being the most common (9.8 %). Posterior wall fractures were the most frequent (20.7 %), while anterior wall fractures were the least common (0.8 %). Operative management was employed in 82 % of cases, with the Kocher-Langenbeck approach being the most commonly employed (42.5 %). Conclusion: High-velocity trauma remains the commonest cause of acetabular trauma in India, primarily affecting young male individuals. Pelvic fractures are the most commonly associated injuries. Posterior wall fractures are the commonest type of acetabular fracture, and the Kocher-Langenbeck approach is the commonly adopted surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.