Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39328280›Full record

ReviewJournal of transport & health2024

The impact of transport, housing, and urban development interventions on older adults' mobility: A systematic review of experimental and quasi-experimental studies.

Thiago Hérick de Sá, Daniele Sudsataya, Andra Fry, Nazak Salehi, Aishwarya Katiki, Megan Mcleod, Greg Rathmell, Jon Cylus, Louise Lafortune, Tine Buffel and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of transport & health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thiago Hérick de SáDemographic Change and Healthy Ageing Unit, Department for Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
Daniele SudsatayaDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.
Andra FryLSE Library, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.
Nazak SalehiDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.
Aishwarya KatikiDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.
Megan McleodDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.
Greg RathmellDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.
Jon CylusEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, UK.
Louise LafortuneCambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, UK.
Tine BuffelManchester Urban Ageing Research Group, University of Manchester, UK.
Patty DoranManchester Urban Ageing Research Group, University of Manchester, UK.
Alana OfficerDemographic Change and Healthy Ageing Unit, Department for Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
Huseyin NaciDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Age-friendly cities and communities aim to enhance and preserve the functional abilities of older adults. This systematic review assesses the impact of interventions in transportation, housing, and urban development on the mobility of older adults. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX up to July 2022 to identify studies that evaluated the impact of transportation, housing, and urban development interventions on older adults' mobility. Only randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies with control groups were included to establish a causal relationship between interventions and mobility outcomes. Findings: We included a total of 15 studies, of which six were randomised controlled trials. Included studies were conducted in high-income settings and employed diverse metrics to assess mobility outcomes. Among housing interventions, three studies examined the impact of assistive technology within home environments for frail older adults. Two of these interventions maintained functional status without improvement, while the third showed a significant decline in outcomes, with the control group faring even worse. Public transport interventions, focused on enhancing mobility through educational initiatives and policy revisions, consistently produced positive outcomes. Interventions related to driving training for older adults, including in-class and on-road assessments, demonstrated beneficial effects. Results from studies evaluating urban design interventions were more varied, with some enhancing mobility by making public spaces more accessible for older adults and others yielding mixed results following infrastructure changes. Interpretation: Interventions in the built environments of older adults, specifically targeting transportation, housing and urban development, have the potential to enhance mobility and related outcomes according to rigorously designed quantitative evaluations. Due to heterogeneity in how mobility is conceptualised in the literature, greater harmonisation in measurement of mobility would help us understand how the social and built environment contribute to maintaining and improving mobility in older adults. Funding: World Health Organization.

Identifiers

PMID39328280
PMCPMC11422292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.