Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39328209›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

A retrospective study of irreversible electroporation for tumors adjacent to perihepatic important structure.

Ju Gong, Shunhong Wang, Shuting Wang, Chaojie Li, Wenhua Li, Yingjie Chen, Ning Xia, Chen Wang, Zhongmin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ju Gong *Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shunhong Wang *Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shuting Wang *Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chaojie LiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenhua LiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yingjie ChenDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ning XiaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chen WangDepartment of Intervention Vascular, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Zhongmin WangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Irreversible electroporation has been proved as a feasible and safe method against tumor in liver. However, few studies focused on tumors adjacent to perihepatic important structure like vessels, biliary system and gall bladder. These structures limit the effectiveness of conventional treatments. The aim of this article is to analyze the clinical outcomes of patients with hepatic tumors at the special sites who received IRE treatment and provide reliable evidence for broadening the scope of IRE's clinical application. Methods: The clinical information of patients who underwent IRE ablation for tumors adjacent to perihepatic important structure between February 2017 and December 2021 was collected and retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT or MRI for further evaluation at the 1-month follow-up and every 3 months thereafter. Post-ablation complications, recurrence, progression-free survival and overall survival were evaluated to analyze the prognosis of IRE ablation adjacent to perihepatic important structure. Categorical variables are presented as numbers followed by percentages. Continuous data are presented as the mean ± deviation. The tumor size and IRE ablation size were evaluated by the maximum diameters. Results: Thirty-two patients who underwent IRE ablation for tumor adjacent to perihepatic important structure were studied in this research. There were 39 lesions in 32 patients treated with IRE ablation. Fourteen of them (35.9%) were located adjacent to the porta hepatis, and 8 of them (20.5%) were located adjacent to the hepatocaval confluence. Subcapsular lesions accounted for 15.4% (6 of 39 lesions). The other 11 lesions were in the para gallbladder (5 of 39 lesions, 12.8%), the caudate lobe (5 of 39 lesions, 12.8%) and the colonic hepatic flexure (1 of 39 lesions, 2.6%). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification system for complications, all relative patients with cancer experienced complications below class III except one patient who developed postoperative hemorrhagic shock and improved after timely treatment. Recurrence Conclusion: IRE ablation is a feasible and safe treatment strategy for tumors adjacent to perihepatic important structure. With improved equipment, optimized therapeutic parameters and long-term clinical trials, IRE will play an increasingly important role in the treatment of tumors in liver.

Indexed as

ablationinterventional radiologyirreversible electroporationliver metastasistumor

Identifiers

PMID39328209
PMCPMC11424374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.